Federal Cannabis Update: 2018 Spending Bill Keeps Rohrabacher-Blumenauer Amendment

Posted by Margolin & Lawrence on March 27, 2018

Last week, despite controversy, criticism from both sides of the aisle, and talk of a veto, President Trump agreed to sign the federal government’s omnibus spending bill for 2018. To the relief of many in the legal cannabis industry, the spending bill retains a provision known as the Rohrabacher-Blumenauer (or Rohrabacher-Farr) amendment, which provides limited protection from federal prosecution for state-level legal cannabis activity.

Given both Trump’s and Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ tough talk on drugs and threats to crack down on the cannabis industry, the continued presence of this amendment is a silver lining for those anxious about the future of legal cannabis. While this won’t mean a change in the federal treatment of marijuana – the amendment has been included in every spending bill since 2014 – it does indicate that the government intends to keep on its current course with regard to cannabis, as the provision has to be renewed every year to remain in effect.

Likewise, though the actual protections afforded by the Rohrabacher-Blumenauer amendment are limited, its being signed into law was, and remains, an important indication of the federal government’s shift in attitude regarding cannabis: as the LA Times reported following the provision’s first inclusion in the spending bill, “Congress for years had resisted calls to allow states to chart their own path on pot. The marijuana measure, which forbids the federal government from using any of its resources to impede state medical marijuana laws, was previously rejected half a dozen times.” In this light, the amendment was a notable pivot from a top-down to a state-level approach to cannabis regulation.

California cannabis consumers and business owners shouldn’t get too comfortable, though: not only does the amendment not change anything about the federal government’s cannabis policy in and of itself, its terms only apply to medical marijuana, not recreational cannabis. So far, the government has rejected proposed amendments that would grant recreational cannabis operations the same protection from federal intervention. For the time being, California cannabis business owners’ best bet is to stay in full compliance with state and local law as the federal situation develops.

For more information or to speak with one of our Los Angeles cannabis attorneys, contact us at info@margolinlawrence.com.

Contact us

Screen Shot 2018-03-26 at 3.26.43 PM.png

News, Medical Marijuana, Medical Cannabis, California, Cannabis, California Marijuana Law, California Cannabis Law, Recreational Cannabis, Recreational Marijuana, Cannabis Law, Los Angeles Cannabis Attorney, Los Angeles Cannabis Lawyer, Cannabidiol, Federal Marijuana Law, Medicinal Marijuana, Medicinal Cannabis, Cannabis Regulations, Marijuana, California Cannabis Attorney, Cannabis Trademark, Cannabis Trademark Lawyer, Cannabis Attorney California, Cannabis Lawyer, Cannabis Attorney, Marijuana Industry, California Cannabis Regulations, Cannabis Extraction, Los Angeles Cannabis Ordinances, Cannabis Microbusiness, Cannabis Microbusinesses, Cannabis Distribution, Cannabis Cultivation, Cannabis Business Los Angeles, Cannabis Business California, Licensing, Los Angeles Cannabis Attorneys, Jeff Sessions, States' Rights

Categories

This blog is not intended as legal advice and should not be taken as such. The possession, use, and/or sale of marijuana is illegal under federal law.