New Cannabis Legislation in Riverside County

Posted by Margolin & Lawrence on October 30, 2018

Last Tuesday, the Board of Supervisors in Riverside County approved an ordinance allowing the following commercial activities starting on 26th December: Testing, Manufacturing, Distribution and Wholesale Nurseries. There is now a 60-day deliberative period regarding the cannabis businesses in Riverside based on the newly approved ordinance. The Board also voted to allow a limited number of dispensaries and cultivators to operate in 2019. Up to nineteen dispensaries and fifty grows will be permitted in unincorporated Riverside County as decided by a 3-2 vote following a public hearing that last nearly four hours. The Board also approved an “Implementation Plan for Retail and Cultivation” uses that is scheduled for process in early January 2019. The proposal process will include pre-registration by interested applicants, and the issuance of a Request for Proposals by the Planning Department. However, there are certain conditions that will be enforced regarding additional taxation and fees associated with each of these activities as determined by the Planning Commission.

Provisional Licensing in California

Posted by Margolin & Lawrence on September 5, 2018

Originally, Senate Bill (SB) 1459 was written to allow the county agricultural commissioners (CACs) to include cannabis among reports about the condition, acreage, production, and value of the county’s agricultural products as submitted to the Secretary of Food and Agriculture. The bill was first introduced in the California State Senate on February 16th, 2018, by Senator Cannella (coauthored by Senators Galgiani and McGuire, Assembly Members Caballero and Wood). The impetus for suggesting that CACs report cannabis as an agricultural product was based on the National Agricultural Statistics Services assessment that “providing crop statistics is basically a way to stabilize the agricultural marketplace." Such action would ultimately facilitate the integration of cannabis cultivation into the marketplace, and moreover encourage unlicensed growers to legitimize their businesses. After passing the Assembly Appropriations Committee 13-4 on August 8th, SB 1459 then received a majority vote upon a third reading on the Senate floor.

LA City Council Update: New Cannabis Rules in Development

Posted by Margolin & Lawrence on March 6, 2018

As of this year, cannabis business is legal in Los Angeles, but the process of drafting and refining the laws and regulations that will actually govern the legal cannabis industry is still in its early stages.

To that end, over the past month, the LA city council met to adopt the following items:

  • Item #22: Prop D Dispensaries, MMD's, AUMA
  • Item #23: MAUCRSA, Prop D, Land Use, Preparation of Ordinance, AUMA
  • Item #24: New hires at the DCR, Cannabis Business Fees, Interim Position Authority
  • Item #25: Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act / State-Chartered Bank / Cannabis Banking Activities

While none of these items are extremely surprising in their own right, they may have significant consequences for the nature of Los Angeles’ cannabis industry.

For instance, Item #23 lays out a path to adjust the LA municipal code, adding “provisions to allow for the Cannabis Regulation Commission to make exceptions to the 600-foot school restriction for non-retail cannabis activities subject to a California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 analysis of environmental impacts and conditions to address public health, safety and welfare considerations, as well as a public hearing.” This means that buildings that were not in the correct zoning could be, if the City finds after the environmental analysis that there are not negative effects from having a cannabis cultivation or manufacturing operation near a school. A change to this rule would potentially mean that, as long as they were in keeping with public health and safety, cannabis businesses could be located in far more locations across LA. Note that under state law, local jurisdictions can allow for closer than 600 feet. 

Other ideas in these items may also have major impacts on the LA cannabis industry. For instance, Item #23 also provides for mixed-light cultivation and social consumption lounges, two activities that the city’s cannabis ordinances haven’t allowed in the past, while Item #25 expresses the city’s support for a State-chartered bank that would allow cannabis businesses to bank their money in California. Each of these changes would be a major step toward full legal legitimacy for marijuana in the Los Angeles area.

While these items are significant in their own right, they also reflect a trend of increasing acceptance of the cannabis industry in LA. Establishing regulations however,  is an ongoing process. For more information, check our guide to California cannabis business law or contact us at info@margolinlawrence.com to speak with one of our Los Angeles cannabis lawyers.

Contact us

Ask A Cannabis Trademark Lawyer: How Do I Apply For A State Trademark?

Posted by Margolin & Lawrence on January 9, 2018

 As of January 1st, 2018, the long wait is over: cannabis business owners can apply for California state trademarks. The application form can be obtained here: http://bpd.cdn.sos.ca.gov/ts/forms/tm-100.pdf. Because cannabis is still federally illegal and cannabis products themselves cannot be trademarked, this is a viable avenue for many California cannabis brands that will protect your business marks within the state. You can read our prior post about USPTO Trademarks here.

According to the website for the Office of the California Secretary of State:

“Beginning January 1, 2018, customers may register their cannabis-related Trademark or Service Mark with the California Secretary of State's office so long as:

1.The mark is lawfully in use in commerce within California; and 

2.Matches the classification of goods and services adopted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office.  

If the application submitted to register a Trademark or Service Mark is found deficient, the application will be returned to the registrant for correction.

Note: Not all cannabis-related products can be registered under current law due to the inability to meet federal classifications.”

This means that in order to obtain your state marks, you must be lawfully using the marks in commerce at the time of the application. Therefore, you will need to be licensed in compliance with SB 94,  both at the local and state level, before you’re eligible for trademark approval. Otherwise, if you claim an unlicensed use, you may run into issues with the Secretary of State. Further, once your license is obtained, you must also show that you’re making actual, bona fide use of the trademarks on your products in the stream of commerce. That means that customers are identifying you by your brand when they purchase your goods or services in the marketplace.

CA Cannabis Licensing Explained in 2 Minutes - Video

Posted by Margolin & Lawrence on December 31, 2017

As we prepare for January 1 and recreational cannabis in California, many legal questions remain for cannabis businesses. In this video, Los Angeles Cannabis Attorneys Margolin & Lawrence explain the local and state licensing process for cannabis businesses in California. If you are looking for a high level overview of what you will need to do to start a cannabis business, or get your existing cannabis business into compliance, this is the place to start.

LA Cannabis Licensing & Social Equity

Posted by Margolin & Lawrence on June 29, 2017

As explained in our previous blog post, “compliance” will be a major factor in the distribution of marijuana licenses in Los Angeles – and cannabis lawyers around the city are fielding a number of questions about what, exactly, LA’s priority licensing process will entail.

The draft regulations the City has released extend a certain amount of privilege to existing marijuana sellers when it comes to licensing. Businesses and dispensaries that have operated “in substantial compliance” with prior iterations of marijuana law will be given priority, allowing them to continue operating while their license approvals are pending. Clearly, this confers a major business advantage, which has raised concerns about whether a compliance-based approach to awarding priority is equitable.

Disqualifying potential cannabis business owners for past violations, but opening the door to “compliant” newcomers, threatens to reinforce inequality. As Drug Policy Alliance policy director Cat Packer, slated to head the City of LA’s Cannabis Commission, explained in an interview with Merry Jane, “The impact of marijuana prohibition and the drug wars was heaviest in black and brown latino communities. If you say people with prior arrests and convictions can’t participate, it automatically has a disproportionate effect on communities that were punished by the War on Drugs.” In other words, privileging “compliance” could compound the negative effects of marijuana prohibition, blocking communities which have historically been more likely to be punished for cannabis use from gaining access to the benefits of the new, legal marijuana industry. As attorneys who have practiced in cannabis law for many years, we have seen the damage prohibition has done to these communities, and are fully supportive of a restorative approach to justice through the licensing process.

The LA City Council recently moved to create a Social Equity Program for marijuana licensing, intending to serve “those individuals and communities that were disproportionately harmed by cannabis prohibition.” This follows in the path of a similar program in Oakland, which reserved half of new dispensary permits for residents who lived in certain neighborhoods, had below-average annual incomes, or had previously faced cannabis convictions. Given how much larger Los Angeles' marijuana industry is than Oakland's, however, the mechanics of the LA program may need to be worked out, and it may not be able to mirror the Oakland model in every way.

Whatever the exact parameters of LA's Social Equity Program end up being, (and however they'll be affected by recent changes to state and city licensing regulations,) the priority-based system will continue to play a major role in deciding which marijuana businesses are allowed to operate. At present, the city plans to reserve a special round of applications for organizations that fit a profile similar to the requirements Oakland used. For more on priority and marijuana laws to the new state law (MAUCRSA), check our previous blog posts or guide to Prop 64, or email us at info@margolinlawrence.com.

 

The M&L Guide to CA's Cannabis Laws, by LA's Top Med. Cannabis Lawyers

Posted by Margolin & Lawrence on June 19, 2017

By California’s Leading Med. Cannabis Lawyers, Margolin & Lawrence

What are the new California cannabis laws as of June 2017?

On June 15, 2017, the California Senate passed S.B. 94, the MAUCRSA. The MAUCRSA effectively repeals the MCRSA and establishes a single regulatory regime with two parallel tr

acks: one for medical and one for recreational. One of the key changes coming out of this new legislation are that cannabis businesses may be able to co-locate, meaning they can have recreational and medical activities licensed on the same property, so long as they obtain two separate licenses and follow all the compliance requirements for each track. Take the time to read the regulations yourself and also make sure to consult with a qualified cannabis lawyer who can advise you on how to comply with the requirements for state licensing and set up your business for success. 

The MAUCRSA still has two parallel licensing tracks: 

A-licensees will be applying for adult use/Prop 64 licenses.

M-licensees will be applying under the medical regime. 

 

Here are our med. cannabis attorneys' top takeaways from the new bill:

  • Co-location: the same facility may be able to have a medical and an adult use license under the new regulations.
  • City/County Ordinances: You will still need local authorization from your City or County before you can apply for a state license under the MAUCRSA.
  • Delivery: There is more clarity around how delivery operators can and should operate, particularly with respect to local jurisdictions in the MAUCRSA. See SEC. 63. Section 26090 of the Business and Professions Code (e)
  • Delivery: those without storefronts can deliver to customers (so long as it complies with local regs).
  • Edibles: will contain 10mg THC or less per serving & will be marked with a universal symbol which the Department of Public Health will release later this year, among other requirements.
  • Priority Applications: applicants who have been operating in compliance with the Compassionate Use Act of 1996 and its implementing laws prior to September 1, 2016 will receive priority in the state licensing process.
  • Residency requirement: the provision in the AUMA requiring proof of state residency prior to 2015 has been repealed.
  • Appellations Control & Organic designations: the state also clarified the rules around naming your product after a City/County and paved the path for eventually allowing organic certifications on cannabis products.
  • Cultivation: Cultivators will need to identify the source of their water supply under SEC. 48 § 26060.1(1)(A).

 

You can read the full text of S.B. 94 or the MAUCRSA here:

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billCompareClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB94

What are the licensing categories?

The MAUCRSA will license for 20 different categories. Each activity requires a separate license. So, if you are applying for a cultivation site and a manufacturing site, you will need to complete two separate applications for each activity. (Plus two applications for your local jurisdiction before you can apply for the state license). 

The main categories are:

Dispensary/Retailer Licenses – License for retail sale of cannabis and cannabis products.  The dispensary licenses also allows for deliveries.

Manufacturing Licenses – There are two types of manufacturing license types.  One for use of volatile solvents, another for non-volatile manufacturing processes.  The state will limit the number of licenses that use volatile solvents because of public safety concerns.

Testing License – Laboratories that test cannabis products before they reach the patient or consumer. Required to be a third party, independent from the other operators in the supply chain.

Cultivation Licenses – Commercial cultivation licenses vary depending on size of grow, and the types of light that are used. Note that many local jurisdictions are banning outdoor cultivation because of perceived nuisance by neighbors.

Distributor License – Storage and distribution of products from the cultivators and/or manufacturers to dispensaries.

Transporter License – Transporters of cannabis and cannabis products between licensees.

A-licensees and M-licensees will be able to apply for licenses in the following categories under the MAUCRSA (updated June 19, 2017):

SEC. 31. Section 26050 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:

26050. (a) The license classification pursuant to this division shall, at a minimum, be as follows:

(1) Type 1—Cultivation; Specialty outdoor; Small.

(2) Type 1A—Cultivation; Specialty indoor; Small.

(3) Type 1B—Cultivation; Specialty mixed-light; Small.

(4) Type 1C—Cultivation; Specialty cottage; Small.

(5)  Type 2—Cultivation; Outdoor; Small.

(6)  Type 2A—Cultivation; Indoor; Small.

(7)  Type 2B—Cultivation; Mixed-light; Small.

(8)  Type 3—Cultivation; Outdoor; Medium.

(9)  Type 3A—Cultivation; Indoor; Medium.

(10)  Type 3B—Cultivation; Mixed-light; Medium.

(11)  Type 4—Cultivation; Nursery.

(12)  Type 5—Cultivation; Outdoor; Large.

(13)  Type 5A—Cultivation; Indoor; Large.

(14)  Type 5B—Cultivation; Mixed-light; Large.

(15)  Type 6—Manufacturer 1.

(16)  Type 7—Manufacturer 2.

(17)  Type 8—Testing laboratory. 

(18)  Type 10—Retailer.

(19)  Type 11—Distributor.

(20)  Type 12—Microbusiness. 

Read more here: S.B. 94

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billCompareClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB94

 

 

 

Can I apply directly to the State of California starting January 1, 2018?

NO. You will need authorization from your local jurisdiction in order to apply for a state license.

What is the process on a local level for the cannabis licensing application process?

There are 482 cities and 58 counties in California. Each has its own rules and regulations regarding cannabis. The City Council or Board of Supervisors will begin with marijuana as a discussion item on the agenda. Then they will vote to write a draft ordinance. Once there is a draft ordinance, there will be a first reading at one meeting. Then, a second meeting will be held where there will be a second meeting and the ordinance will be voted on. Once the ordinance is passed, the City will be allowed to open up applications to potential cannabis licensees. Typically, you will have 1-3 months to complete the application once it is released by the City or County. Then, once you turn in your application, they will have somewhere between 1-3 months to review it and let you know if you are moving on to the next step (depending on how they set up the process) or if you are licensed. After you complete the local licensing process, you can apply for your state cannabis license.

What are the new Los Angeles laws on cannabis? 

Being Los Angeles lawyers, we are closely following the new draft regulations coming from our City Council after the passage of Measure M in the March 2017 municipal election. You can read up-to-the-minute coverage of the LA Draft regulations on our blog. In a nutshell, LA’s draft licensing process gives an overview of where cannabis business can be located (zoning), as well as laying out new rules for sensitive use areas (800 foot distancing required). There are different regulations for cannabis dispensaries, cannabis cultivators, cannabis manufacturers, and other cannabis businesses. For example, dispensaries need to be at least 800 feet from other dispensaries, whereas cultivators and manufacturers do not have this buffer distancing requirement. The LA licensing process will have 3 waves of applicants: Priority Processing, Social Equity, and General Public. Priority Processing will be for existing cannabis businesses that meet certain requirements and are in the correct zoning. Social Equity will be for applicants who were affected by the war on drugs and we will be receiving more information on this round over the next 60 days. The General Public will be when anyone who does not qualify for Priority Processing or Social Equity can apply, and will come a few months later. The estimate from the City is that the Priority Processing applications will open in October 2017.

What are the requirements in an application for a city or county license?

The exact requirements will vary by jurisdiction. Typically, they fall into the following areas:

Some cities and counties will require more than the below, and some will not require documents to support each of these categories.

  • Type of activity: each cannabis related activity will have its own license under the new state and local compliance regimes. The main areas for licensing will be: cultivation, manufacturing, transportation, and distribution (dispensaries).
    1. Some local jurisdictions are licensing for certain activities but not for others. For example, accepting applications for cultivation but banning applications for dispensaries.
    2. Additionally, regarding cultivation, many jurisdictions have shown a preference for indoor cultivation over outdoor, due to the perceived nuisance of outdoor cultivation. Check with your local jurisdiction to see what activities are currently eligible for licensing applications.

(1) Business plan: a business plan that outlines the objectives and operating structure of the company as well as the key management and officers will be required. The plan will also require projected operating costs and revenues, planned relationships with suppliers and/or distributors, and an operational overview of how the business will work and what will be accomplished in the first 12-24 months.

(2) Zoning and Land Use: Is the property far enough from sensitive use areas? Is it in the correct zoning for land use purposes according to the municipal or county code (manufacturing, industrial, commercial vs. residential)?

The state law requires that any marijuana business be at least 600 feet from a school. Some local jurisdictions have also included parks, day care centers, and areas where youth congregate as “sensitive use.” Additionally, some have required 1,000 feet of distance. Also note that federal law has enhanced criminal penalties for marijuana distribution within 1,000 feet of schools.

(3) Security plan: many applications require a detailed security plan that shows alarms, personnel and strategy relating to securing the premises for retail (dispensaries) or cultivation operations.

(4) Insurance: some applications will require that you show proof of insurance for your operation.

(5) Site plans: some applications will require you to hire a civil engineer or architect to draw up site plans for your cultivation operation.

(6) Environmental impact / Waste management: some applications will require a waste management plan and/or statement of water usage and how potential adverse consequences will be avoided.

(7) Live Scan / Criminal History: Some jurisdictions will require a live scan of the applicants and a disclosure of any criminal history. Some have written the laws so that you will only be disqualified if your prior criminal history involves a crime of moral turpitude. Other regulations state that past marijuana crimes will not count against you so long as they were non-violent. However, check with your local jurisdiction.

(8) Tax Returns: some jurisdictions require prior tax returns for the persons involved and the entity, if it has been in operation in the past.

Want more information on the local and state cannabis licensing process in California? 

 Contact us

 

FURTHER READING:

Federal Law – The Controlled Substances Act of 1970

21 U.S. Code § 812 – Schedules of controlled substances

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/812

 

California Bureau of Cannabis Control 

 

Chris Conrad’s Guide to Cannabis Yields and Dosages:

http://www.chrisconrad.com/pdf/cannayieldsdosage10.pdf

 

CA Marijuana Laws Pursuant to Prop 64 – final regulations will be released later in 2017.

You can read the draft trailer bill released in April 2017 here

 

Marijuana Taxes

CA Revenue & Tax Code Division 2, Pt. 14.5 § 34010-34021.5

 

Industrial Hemp / CBD

HSC 11018.5 – What is “Industrial Hemp?”

Food & Ag Code 81000-81010 – California State Industrial hemp regulations (effective Jan 1, 2017)

 

California Cannabis Law FAQ

Is cannabis legal in California? Yes, and no. Three legal regimes apply to Cannabis: Federal, State and Local. Under Federal Law, Cannabis is still classified as a Schedule I substance under the Controlled Substances Act. Because there are a number of areas of law relating to cannabis it is essential to hire a cannabis lawyer who is familiar not only with the state regulations but also with the Federal law. There has been legislation introduced to de-schedule Marijuana and reclassify it from Schedule I, but nothing has passed yet as of June 2017 and the CSA is still the Federal Law in all 50 states.

Under State law in California, you have a defense as an individual charged with possession for sale of marijuana (Cal Health and Safety Code 11359) if you are a marijuana patient collectively associating with other patients, as long as you are doing so in a not-for-profit way, which is the subject of much confusion and litigation. Prop 64 which went into effect in November 2016, decriminalizes possession of cannabis in California and allows individuals to cultivate up to 6 plants per residence.

Cannabis businesses will be able to become legal if they are approved for state permits under the MAUCRSA. It is important to note that in order to apply for a California state license, you will need a local permit from either your city or county and be compliant with the local regulations and have been approved by your local governing body in order to do so.

Please be advised that marijuana activity is still against federal law as noted above. There is a quasi-defense available as long as Congress continues to pass an appropriations rider (that has been reinstated every year so far since 2014) which prohibits DEA spending on medical marijuana enforcement. California also introduced a bill in 2017 (AB 1578) that would prevent local law enforcement from participating with federal authorities on marijuana enforcement activities if it passes.

 

What is the legislative history of legalized Cannabis in California?

California has had a legal regime for medical marijuana collectives since and it was more robustly implemented via Senate Bill 420 in 2004. In 2017, the California Senate passed the MAUCRSA which repeals the MCRSA and creates medical marijuana compliance standards merged with adult use standards in one bill that creates two parallel tracks of regulations.

You can read S.B. 94 or the MAUCRSA which passed in June 2017 here: http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billCompareClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB94 

You can read the text of prior Medical Marijuana laws passed in California here:

HSC 11362.5 Prop 215 – Text of Prop. 215

HSC 11362.7 – 11362.85 CA Medical Marijuana Program Act (SB 420)

HSC 11362.9 California Marijuana Research Program

 

 

What is the process for applying for a city or county license? 

There are 58 counties in California and over 482 distinct municipalities in the state. Under the state regulations, each city and county has a right to create their own laws to regulate cannabis, up to certain limits. Because you will need a local license in order to apply for a state one under the dual licensing structure, the local laws are extremely pertinent to anyone hoping to obtain a license for their cannabis business. Check with your City Council or County Board of Supervisors to see whether there are any ordinances in place or upcoming meetings relating to cannabis regulation. Some counties have temporary bans in place, while others are opening up for applications in the coming weeks, and still others have temporarily closed applications while they are processing those who applied in 2016.

Attend your local City Council and Board of Supervisors meetings when there is medical marijuana on the agenda. As a member of the public, you will be able to contribute to the conversation and help shape the cannabis regulations in your local jurisdiction.  If you hire us to consult regarding permitting or licensing, we can and do set up meetings with council and Board of Supervisor members to discuss our concerns and try to help shape the local regulations. If the City or County is accepting applications, often the first step will be to obtain a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to confirm that your location is properly zoned and comports with the land use designations the City or County has passed. After your CUP is approved, you will move to the next step and be able to submit your Business License application permit. (note that this process varies by local jurisdiction).

 

What are the requirements in an application for a city or county license?

The exact requirements will vary by jurisdiction so it is important to consult with a cannabis lawyer who can interpret the local ordinance and advise you appropriately. Typically, application requirements fall into the following areas:

Some cities and counties will require more than the below, and some will not require documents to support each of these categories.

  • Type of activity: each cannabis related activity will have its own license under the new state and local compliance regimes. The main areas for licensing will be: cultivation, manufacturing, transportation, and distribution (dispensaries).
    1. Some local jurisdictions are licensing for certain activities but not for others. For example, accepting applications for cultivation but banning applications for dispensaries.
    2. Additionally, regarding cultivation, many jurisdictions have shown a preference for indoor cultivation over outdoor, due to the perceived nuisance of outdoor cultivation. Check with your local jurisdiction to see what activities are currently eligible for licensing applications.

(1) Business plan: a business plan that outlines the objectives and operating structure of the company as well as the key management and officers will be required. The plan will also require projected operating costs and revenues, planned relationships with suppliers and/or distributors, and an operational overview of how the business will work and what will be accomplished in the first 12-24 months.

(2) Zoning and Land Use: Is the property far enough from sensitive use areas? Is it in the correct zoning for land use purposes according to the municipal or county code (manufacturing, industrial, commercial vs. residential)?

The state law requires that any marijuana business be at least 600 feet from a school. Some local jurisdictions have also included parks, day care centers, and areas where youth congregate as “sensitive use.” Additionally, some have required 1,000 feet of distance. Also note that federal law has enhanced criminal penalties for marijuana distribution within 1,000 feet of schools.

(3) Security plan: many applications require a detailed security plan that shows alarms, personnel and strategy relating to securing the premises for retail (dispensaries) or cultivation operations.

(4) Insurance: some applications will require that you show proof of insurance for your operation.

(5) Site plans: some applications will require you to hire a civil engineer or architect to draw up site plans for your cultivation operation.

(6) Environmental impact / Waste management: some applications will require a waste management plan and/or statement of water usage and how potential adverse consequences will be avoided.

(7) Live Scan / Criminal History: Some jurisdictions will require a live scan of the applicants and a disclosure of any criminal history. Some have written the laws so that you will only be disqualified if your prior criminal history involves a crime of moral turpitude. Other regulations state that past marijuana crimes will not count against you so long as they were non-violent. However, check with your local jurisdiction.

(8) Tax Returns: some jurisdictions require prior tax returns for the persons involved and the entity, if it has been in operation in the past.

 

Do I need a state license to grow cannabis for personal use?

Under the MCRSA, qualified patients are exempt from the state license program if cultivating less than 100 square feet for personal medical use. However, this requirement begins Jan 1, 2018. It is debatable whether the sunset clause applies to this requirement. The sunset clause is the part of the MCRSA that allows the collective defense until one year after the beginning of the new regime, namely January 1, 2019. Until then, a patient may possess what is reasonable for their medical needs, and there is currently a draft gubernatorial proposal to amend the MCRSA to allow that “reasonable needs” test to continue instead of the 100 square foot regime.

As of Jan. 1, 2018, Primary caregivers with five or fewer patients are allowed up to 500 square feet (up to 30 plants). An exemption under MCRSA does not prevent a local government from further restricting or banning the cultivation, provision, etc. of medical cannabis by individual patients or caregivers in accordance with its constitutional police powers under Section 7, Article XI of the CA Constitution. AUMA (Prop. 64) allows individuals to grow cannabis for personal non-medical use (up to six plants per residence) without a state license. Only six plants are allowed to be grown per residence. All plants and harvested cannabis in excess of one (1) ounce must be kept within the person’s private residence, in a locked space, that is not visible from a public place. But please note that Prop. 64 has statutory language that prevents CPS from interfering with families of patients on that basis alone, but is not explicitly extended to AUMA users. So, it is best practice to have a medical recommendation if you are using or growing marijuana, if you are using it medically.

 

Can I sell homegrown cannabis plants or products to others without a license?

No. Proposition 64 does not allow the sale of homegrown cannabis, whether whole plant, clippings, clones, or any product derived from any part of the plant. But it does allow all Californians to give away under an ounce.

 

Can I smoke or consume cannabis in public places?

No. AUMA (Prop. 64) prohibits smoking or consumption of medical and recreational cannabis in public places or in places where smoking tobacco is prohibited, which includes but is not limited to hallways and lobbies of apartment buildings and hotels, on the street, in schools, amusement parks, public parks and places of business usually open to the general public. Additionally, consumption or smoking of cannabis is prohibited within 1,000 feet of a school or youth area while children present, except on private residential property provided smoking is not detectable by children. One issue that will be before city councils and county boards of supervisors will be zoning issues which determine where people may and may not use marijuana for various purposes.

 

FURTHER READING:

 

Federal Law – The Controlled Substances Act of 1970

21 U.S. Code § 812 – Schedules of controlled substances

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/812

 

Chris Conrad’s Guide to Cannabis Yields and Dosages:

http://www.chrisconrad.com/pdf/cannayieldsdosage10.pdf

 

CA Marijuana Laws Pursuant to Prop 64 – final regulations will be released later in 2017.

You can read the draft trailer bill released in April 2017 here

 

Marijuana Taxes

CA Revenue & Tax Code Division 2, Pt. 14.5 § 34010-34021.5

 

Industrial Hemp / CBD

HSC 11018.5 – What is “Industrial Hemp?”

Food & Ag Code 81000-81010 – California State Industrial hemp regulations (effective Jan 1, 2017)

How Many Cannabis Licenses Can I Have In California?

Posted by Margolin & Lawrence on June 6, 2017

Update: The MAUCRSA, which passed June 22, repealed the provisions of the MCRSA that placed restrictions on vertical integration. As of June 30, the state has confirmed in §26053(c) of the California Business and Professions Code that a business may hold more than one license. However, it's still unclear whether there will be a limit on the total number of licenses allowed.

As many of you are well aware, California is in the process of implementing two parallel regulatory regimes that will govern cannabis production, distribution, and sales: the MCRSA, which pertains to medical marijuana, and the AUMA (a.k.a. Prop 64), which pertains to “adult use” or recreational marijuana. Originally, the MCRSA and AUMA had very different treatments of how many activities a business could be licensed for. The MCRSA favored small producers by placing restrictions on the combinations of licenses a single business could hold. The AUMA, on the other hand, allowed for total vertical integration, so one license holder could be licensed for almost the full supply chain of activities.

In California, marijuana licenses are divided into six activities, covering the entire industry: Cultivation, Manufacturing, Testing, Dispensary, Distribution, and Transportation. To ensure that testing facilities remain disinterested, both the MCRSA and the AUMA don't allow a business with a Testing license to hold a license in any other category. On top of that, the MCRSA places a similar restriction on businesses with a Distribution license, and prevents any business from holding licenses in more than two categories. The AUMA forgoes these additional restrictions, making it much more lenient on licensing.

To reduce the confusion caused by the differences between the two acts, a draft trailer bill released on April 3, 2017 by Gov. Jerry Brown’s office proposes that the AUMA's licensing structure be used for both recreational and medical marijuana. Under this proposal, the MCRSA’s restrictions on which types of licenses one licensee can hold would be loosened, potentially allowing for vertical integration not only under the AUMA but also under the MCRSA. However, opinions are divided on whether this change would help or harm California's marijuana businesses.

Under the AUMA's licensing structure, a single business could operate in almost every section of the cannabis supply chain. The MCRSA's licensing structure was explicitly designed to prevent this kind of vertical integration, out of concern that lighter restrictions would allow large corporate interests to dominate the industry. However, the draft bill argues that, since the AUMA includes other anti-monopoly measures, small independent businesses would also benefit from access to vertical integration. Whatever the outcome, this change in licensing structure would present a major turning point for California's marijuana regulations.

Under California’s Administrative Procedure Act (APA), regulatory bureaus must present draft regulations and receive comments on those regulations from the public (a requirement called Notice & Comment). The California APA allows the public to participate in the adoption of state regulations in order to ensure that the regulations are clear, necessary, and legally valid. The MCRSA is no exception, and you have a few more days to make your voice heard. If you have an opinion about Vertical Integration, you can email California’s Bureau of Medical Cannabis Regulation at bmcr.comments@dca.ca.gov.  For more information on the AUMA and Prop 64, consult our guide to California's marijuana laws or email us at info@margolinlawrence.com.

1

Categories

This blog is not intended as legal advice and should not be taken as such. The possession, use, and/or sale of marijuana is illegal under federal law.